Good day,
We have an expense with some of the per diem GST portion being coded to the expense line rather than to the GST receivable. It seems it affects the lines if the "city of purpose" is left blank...if the city is populated it looks like the per diem is managed properly. Ie. per diem of $7.35 in some instances the full amount is coded to the expense and in others the per diem is broken down with $7.00 coded to the expense and $.35 coded to the GST receivable. Again, we think it might be linked to the City of Purpose on the claim.
